<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Folksonomy</title>
	<link>http://www.participationliteracy.com/2006/05/18/folksonomy/</link>
	<description>A Research 2.0 Project about Participation in Web 2.0 Environments</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Giger</title>
		<link>http://www.participationliteracy.com/2006/05/18/folksonomy/#comment-3670</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.participationliteracy.com/2006/05/18/folksonomy/#comment-3670</guid>
					<description>Good idea Alexander, &quot;peersonomy&quot; sounds like a working concept in the context you mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea Alexander, &#8220;peersonomy&#8221; sounds like a working concept in the context you mention.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alexander Huber</title>
		<link>http://www.participationliteracy.com/2006/05/18/folksonomy/#comment-3641</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.participationliteracy.com/2006/05/18/folksonomy/#comment-3641</guid>
					<description>&quot;Folksonomy&quot; is a bit of an unfortunate term, as it suggests a means of participation which goes beyond the strict realm of academia, maybe we should start calling it &quot;peersonomy&quot; when we use the term in a research context? I doubt that there is a place for &quot;clouds&quot; and people's &quot;associations&quot; in scholarship. I think we need to be careful when using these terms, and many others in the Web 2.0 context, in a scholarly environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Folksonomy&#8221; is a bit of an unfortunate term, as it suggests a means of participation which goes beyond the strict realm of academia, maybe we should start calling it &#8220;peersonomy&#8221; when we use the term in a research context? I doubt that there is a place for &#8220;clouds&#8221; and people&#8217;s &#8220;associations&#8221; in scholarship. I think we need to be careful when using these terms, and many others in the Web 2.0 context, in a scholarly environment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Giger</title>
		<link>http://www.participationliteracy.com/2006/05/18/folksonomy/#comment-1368</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.participationliteracy.com/2006/05/18/folksonomy/#comment-1368</guid>
					<description>Aj då, en liten kråka har dröjt sig kvar... Tack för tipset Andreas. Nu är det fixat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aj då, en liten kråka har dröjt sig kvar&#8230; Tack för tipset Andreas. Nu är det fixat&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.participationliteracy.com/2006/05/18/folksonomy/#comment-1366</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.participationliteracy.com/2006/05/18/folksonomy/#comment-1366</guid>
					<description>Sitter och läser igenom din text just nu och uppmärksammade ett litet stavfel. &quot;Dewy Decimal System&quot; både systemet och personen bakom det heter väl Dewey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sitter och läser igenom din text just nu och uppmärksammade ett litet stavfel. &#8220;Dewy Decimal System&#8221; både systemet och personen bakom det heter väl Dewey.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
